Mizzou/Baylor Post-Mortem
That was close.
Since the Great Expectation Adjustment of 2008, a three-point victory over Baylor is not that big a surprise. The Tigers aren’t an elite team nor a great team. The Tigers are a very good college football team appropriately ranked around 14 in the country. There are worse things.

Still, the Tigers looked like they were going to roll yesterday and the fact that they didn’t is a source of disappointment. They were up 14-0, in the red zone poised to go up by three TDs, when Chase Daniel threw a pick. The possibility of domination was gone. Baylor had moved the ball well up to that point, but down by 21 Baylor may have had to leave its gameplan behind. The only Baylor defender of whom I’d heard, Joe Pawelek, saved the game for the time being by intercepting that Daniel pass. The rest was a battle of, seemingly, two evenly matched teams (as sad as that sounds).
The ending was exciting! Tied at 28 in the fourth quarter, Chase Daniel found a streaking wideout down the sideline with a perfect pass leading to the go ahead touchdown. Oh wait, that was Colt McCoy. Chase Daniel, with just seconds to play, made a bullet pass to his best playmaker, who tiptoed into the end zone for the six. What? Oh yeah, that was Graham Harrell.
Chase Daniel led the team on a game-winning drive. Sure, there were two Mike Kelly “Daniel’s pass is INTERCEPTED!!!!…but dropped” calls during that drive. Sure, the Tigers didn’t actually get into the end zone, but the Unsung Hero came through big with the game winning kick.
But, what of our Sung Hero Chase Daniel? It is indisputable - to me anyway - that Daniel is the best QB in Tiger history. As documented on these pages last week, he owns just about every QB record there is at Mizzou. Never before has a Tiger player been invited to New York for the Heisman party. His winning percentage as a starting QB is far and away the best of any Mizzou QB who has started a significant number of games. As the greatest QB ever, what is his Tiger legacy beyond the numbers? There’s still some of that book to write, but it’s worth discussing now.
What is Chase Daniel’s signature win? This is a conversation we here at AT have been tossing around a lot this year. Was it Kansas ‘07? If that’s it, then that’s disappointing. The Cotton Bowl? No. Arkansas wasn’t a real “team” and, besides, Daniel played poorly. The two Illinois games? Maybe, but meh. Chase has had some chances to get the dramatic come-from-behind win, most notably this year against Okie State. There he forced passes, got picked a couple times, and we lost. Against Baylor, he threw two picks in the tight game and nearly threw one more with the game tied in the 4th quarter. Is Chase Daniel just unclutch?
In fourth quarters this season Daniel has thrown 4 interceptions v. 3 touchdowns. For a guy with 26 TDs and 8 INTs that might be statistically significant. In situations where the Tigers have trailed by 7 or fewer points, Daniel has thrown 3 INTs v. 0 TDs. Seems rather telling to me. Granted, we’re not talking about an overwhelming sample size. For the sake of comparison, in ‘07, Chase threw 4 INTs v. 3 TDs in 4th quarters and, with the Tigers trailing in a tight game, he had 1 INT v. 4 TDs. If nothing else, these numbers support the idea that last year’s Tigers were better than this year’s.
Northern Exposure (I can do trite headings too). The Mizzou/Baylor game added more evidence that there is a grand canyon of difference between the North and South. Baylor, like Mizzou, is now finished with the opposing division portion of the schedule. Mizzou has struggled mightily vs. the South.
|
MIZZOU |
POINTS FOR TOTAL/GAME | POINTS AGAINST TOTAL/GAME |
| Vs. North | 110/55 | 17/9 |
| Vs. South | 85/28 | 110/37 |
Averaging scores of 55-9 against the North and 28-37 against the South. Baylor has experienced the chasm too.
|
BAYLOR |
POINTS FOR TOTAL/GAME | POINTS AGAINST TOTAL/GAME |
| Vs. North | 86/29 | 73/24 |
| Vs. South | 23/12 | 83/42 |
Though Baylor has a 1-2 record against the North, it averages a 29-24 score. Against the South it’s 12 to 42. Mizzou has to be ecstatic that its last three games are against its Northern brethren. Likewise, Baylor must be bummed.
Tommy Saunders. He got his second 100 yard game of his career and has already matched his 2007 reception total of 41. His improvement hasn’t just come in catching the ball either as he’s gained nearly 200 yards more this year than last. He’s also completed a couple passes and tabulated a passing efficiency rating that would make Phil Johnson blush. Next week is Senior Day and while there are many seniors responsible for spreading joy these past few seasons, Saunders is a fan favorite whose farewell ovation will be long and loud. He’s just gotten better every year and is deserving of the plaudits.
Chase Coffman. Him again. A walking circus catch.
Baylor. This year Barking Carnival, back before people were talking about Robert Griffin III, suggested that Briles would be best served putting the freshman in to run the Bears full time. Scipio Tex wrote:
Truthfully, Briles may just say fuck it (actually, it’s Baylor, so he’ll say “Goosefeathers!”) and start true freshman Robert Griffin, who is a sensational athlete. Which is what I’d do. If Baylor Football can reach respectability by 2010 it will be because of Griffin.
Well said. Briles is a good coach with a potentially elite QB around whom to build. I think Briles’ll get the job done. What does that mean for Baylor? It’s hard to imagine the Bears becoming a powerhouse, but it’s not hard to see them winning seven or eight games every couple years and seeing some bowl action. After all, they do get to play three North teams a year.
RG3 threw the ball well all day - so explained the radio crew - but only had one really good run. Per the announcers, RG3 had many chances to run, but eschewed these chances for throwing the ball away and short throws. He’s clearly the most valuable asset Baylor has so I imagine they’re coaching him not to get hurt. On the flip side, he’s the best player on the team and shouldn’t be shy in taking a game over with his legs. We Tiger fans know of the fine-line between runner and passer and if I were a Bear fan, I’d want RG3 running wild if the situation dictates. For all I know, of course, RG3 never turned down the chance to run and Kelly and Kadlec were just messing with me. It’ll be interesting to watch his progression. Hopefully for Baylor, the coaches won’t have a new bright idea every few games that ultimately just messes with RG3’s head.
Radio. Dude, listening to the game on the radio sucks. It’s hard to believe in this day and age that a ranked team playing against an exciting young QB can’t rate a television crew.
Phenomenol Smith family just before Wolfert’s game-winning kick.
Mike Kelly and John Kadlec do an okay job, I guess. Actually, how would I know? For all I know they’re making everything up. The killer is that the Tigers went from prime time four weeks in a row to a 2 pm kickoff with no TV at all. Oh, how the mighty have fallen. It’s frustrating listening to what Kelly proclaims is a great touchdown catch, barely inbounds, reaching high into the sky to make the grab, but not being able to see it. Luckily for you, Atomic Teeth sent an artist to do courtroom-like renderings of the action. As you can see from the drawing below, Coffman was in bounds.

Next week the Tigers are again on prime time television (6 pm kickoff at Faurot). We will not have to resort to such relics as the radio and crude illustrations.
Conclusion. A win is a win. Style points for a two-loss team don’t matter - the W is all that matters. So, as far as that goes, it was a great day. More drama than should have been necessary, but who cares? And, if you want to be Polly Sunshine, and who doesn’t?, this game might have been just what we needed. Beating CU 58-0 might have erased too many of the memories of the Okie State and UT games. As Chet pointed out, Jaron Baston was making noise about how the Tigers could have beaten Texas with a little more focus. Yikes. The Tigers need to realize they could lose to anyone. It’s hard to imagine losing to either K-State or Iowa State, but the Tigers aren’t good enough to win playing its B game against anyone else’s A game. Even K-State’s A game. The Baylor game is a nice wake up call.
November 2, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Phenom, this is, by far, the best piece I have read about the game . . . and you didn’t even see it.
There’s no doubt that Coffman is great.
In my mind, I’ve been trying to reconcile Daniel’s first great performance as a Tiger versus the last couple of years. I distinctly remember having long disagreements with Gene Claude about pulling Daniel’s redshirt and I was particularly irrate at Arrowhead against Arkansas State when it became a reality. Then, he came into the Iowa St. game when my favorite QB1 went down and led the Tigers to a victory. I resigned myself to being wrong, but I’m not sure that any of it really made a difference. It seems that the Tigers and Daniel merely have an ability to punish average teams with great performances, but do not have the ability to compete or perform against great teams.
I feel guilty complaining about a good team that’s the best the North has to offer (with likely a 10-2 record going into Big XII Championship game). I should’ve known better, but I bought into the hype and I felt like Daniel was bigger than life so he could take this good team and make it great.
November 2, 2008 at 9:03 pm
Awesome. Chase Daniel is super unclutchy. Hell, you can tell by his body language that he doesn’t know what to do when losing.
One minor disagreement…MU can beat KSU at home with our C- game. Should be a fun line and O/U.
November 3, 2008 at 7:24 am
Funny, I have had several arguments with co-workers about Daniel.I do not think he can play in the NFL. He may hold a clip board and wear his hat backwards for the next couple years, but he will never be a legit QB in the league. He does not play well when he is under pressure. Is it his size? Maybe. To me, I think the kid never really faced a pass rush in HS, and since then probably only seen it against the South teams.
I still believe he is the best we have ever had at the position, but it is clear that when things are not going his way, he plays poorly. I will give him all of the credit in the world for the KU game last year. To me, that was the single most important game (at that poinit) we had played in the history of our program, and he was spectacular. I will always thank him for that because I don’t even want to think about it if we had lost that game.
He is like my daughters favorite movie “Happy Feet” When you get pressure on Chase he moves his feet and becomes average. When he can set his feet, he is accurate. But how many times has he underthrown receivers this year? He can’t make the throws McCoy, Harrell, or Bradford can make. Average will not get it done against the Big 12 South. Average will not get it done in the NFL. Watching McCoy and Harrell the other night, I realized that Chase would have thrown 3 picks in that game. Those guys stood in there time after time and made plays.
Outside of the KU game, has there been any other game we won that Chase Patton could not have won? We kill bad teams, and we have played a ton of bad teams. I am sure Pinkel and company made the right choice with Daniel over Patton, but it does make me wonder. I hope he gets one more chance to prove me wrong in Arrowhead.
That being said. I want to thank Chase Daniel. He took the torch from Brad, and made MU football relevant again, and made my last three autumn very enjoyable after the years of suckiness.
November 3, 2008 at 3:22 pm
Mizzou hasn’t had a clutch QB since Baby Joe Montana.
November 3, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Sure Joe, whatever you say.
I just watched the Mizzou/Baylor replay on Big 12 No Huddle. They cut out most of the non-scoring drives, and even some of those, but one thing that stood out was the lack of William Moore’s involvement. I saw him on the field, but he wasn’t making plays. Not the Moore from ‘07 or in the Illinois game - I wonder if his foot’s slowing him down.
November 4, 2008 at 8:31 am
If we were playing cover 2 a lot, and Baylor threw all underneath stuff, he wouldn’t have been involved a lot.
I need to see the game, but from what I’ve read, we didn’t try to challenge Baylor much underneath. I think we should have made Griffin throw the ball up top, but I guess the Illinois game scared us away from that.
November 4, 2008 at 10:02 am
GC,
That’s exactly what I saw all game. I don’t hardly recall Griffin throwing a deep-ish pass the entire game. That was the ultimate “bend but don’t break” defense, which worked against Colorado, but that’s because they’re incredibly inept.
Nice to see Kenji Jackson play a lot, I really think Garrett’s been exposed a lot this year.
November 4, 2008 at 11:51 am
Pretty sure I would have watched the KU tape the last 3 years of Brad’s career and used the defense KU used against us. Of course, Baylor might not have been as stubborn to change as Pinkel was at that time.
Watching that game, I realized how lucky we were that the Baylor kid dropped the INT before the FG. That had pick six written all over it. Plus, Jimmy’s fumble, dribbling exhibition was lucky as well. Tigers were very fortunate.
November 4, 2008 at 12:40 pm
Boo, agreed wholeheartedly on the first part. The second part, though, about Pinkel “changing.” What could he do? Make Brad Smith know how to read a defense and pass against a zone? The only thing Pinkel could have done is to have made Smith into a “slash” and play someone (Sonny Riccio?) at QB most of the time. I firmly believe that Brad Smith was the oddest combination of extreme strengths and weaknesses I have seen in a college football player, and that made it incredibly hard to find a way to use him.
November 4, 2008 at 12:42 pm
I don’t know if Garrett has been exposed, or if Gettis/Bridges/other CBs have been exposed. I know Coach Ford said at the StL Tiger Club meeting a few weeks back that the corners had been failing to redirect receivers into the middle of the field in cover 1 and 2 schemes.
I think it is very difficult to determine whether a safety or a corner is exposed in pass defense, as we don’t know responsibilities and rarely see the entire play. But I do agree that Kenji Jackson playing is a good thing. I’m really surprised that Hobson, or even Rutland, hasn’t been playing more over Bridges. He has looked exposed a lot to me.